Dog Acquisition in Lower-Income Communities as Consumer Behavior: An Exploratory Qualitative Study

Authors

  • Arnold Arluke Center for Animals and Public Policy, Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine at Tufts University, N. Grafton, MA, USA
  • Mary Elizabeth Rauktis School of Social Work, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0161-9337

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56771/jsmcah.v3.73

Keywords:

dog acquisition, qualitative research, low income, consumer behavior, animal welfare

Abstract

Introduction: This qualitative research article examines the nature of the decision-making processes used by people to acquire dogs in low-income communities compared to how people in middle and upper socioeconomic communities make this decision.

Methods: We explored the preferences, thoughts, and concerns that influenced decisions of a convenience sample of 40 respondents who acquired dogs or puppies within the last 2 years. Sixty-five percent of respondents (N = 26) described living in or near poverty, while 35% held middle or upper socioeconomic status. To elicit detailed accounts of their decision-making process, a semi-structured interview was administered. Results were subjected to qualitative data analysis to identify different features of the acquisition process and to compare these features by respondents’ socioeconomic status.

Results: Most respondents described similar ‘stages’ in dog acquisition as consumers making other high-involvement purchases: recognizing need (mulling), information-gathering and evaluating (creating criteria sets, sourcing pragmatically, and encountering decision triggers), and adjusting to new dogs post-acquisition. Aspects of acquisition were extended or attenuated, and more complex than predicted by models built for inanimate products. Social class influenced some but not all stages of dog acquisition.

Conclusion: Findings from this analysis support advertising and wide dissemination of adoptable dog information. A community engaged model of sheltering including non-judgmental adoptions, community veterinary and behavioral pet support, and building trust could increase local dog adoption.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

DiGiacomo N, Arluke A, Patronek G. Surrendering Pets to Shelters: The Relinquisher’s Perspective. Anthrozoös. 1998;11: 41–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.1998.11425086

Coe J, Young I, Lambert K, Dysart L, Nogueira Borden L, Rajić A. A Scoping Review of Published Research on the Relinquishment of Companion Animals. J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2014;17(3):253–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888705.2014.899910

Minnis L. Criteria Influencing Potential Canine Adopters’ Decision During a Shelter or Adoption Event Visit. Doctoral Dissertation, George Mason University, 2021.

Minnis L, Davis D, Loftis K. Decision Factors Considered by Potential Dog Adopters During Shelter Visitation. J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2022;5:1–6.

Bir C, Widmar N, Croney C. Stated Preferences for Dog Characteristics and Sources of Acquisition. Animals. 2017;7:59. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani7080059

Holland K. Acquiring a Pet Dog: A Review of Factors Affecting the Decision-Making of Prospective Dog Owners. Animals. 2019;9:124. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9040124

King T, Marston L, Bennett P. Describing the Ideal Australian Companion Dog. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2009;120:84–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2009.04.011

Sandøe P, Kondrup S, Bennett P, Forkman B, Meyer I, Proschowsky H, et al. Why Do People Buy Dogs with Potential Welfare Problems Related to Extreme Conformation and Inherited Disease? A Representative Study of Danish Owners of Four Small Dog Breeds. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0172091. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172091

Weiss E, Miller K, Mohan-Gibbons H, Vela C. Why Did You Choose This Pet? Adopters and Pet Selection Preferences in Five Animal Shelters in the United States. Animals. 2012;2:144–159. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani2020144

Vink L, Dijkstra A, Epstude K. A Longitudinal Study of Decision Making in the Process of Acquiring a Dog. Anthrozoös. 2019;32:489–501. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2019.1621520

Fernandez A. Animals as Quasi-Property/Persons. In: Linzey A, Linzey C, eds, Anim Ethics Anim Law. Lexington Press; 2022, pp. 129–143.

Favre D. Animals as Living Property. In: Kalof L, ed. The Oxford Handbook of Animal Studies. Oxford University Press; 2015, pp. 65–80.

Shepard A. The Duality of Dogs: Property or Person? Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy. 2023;37:654.

Goodwin M. The Free-Market Approach to Adoption: The Value of a Baby. BC Third World LJ. 2006;26:61.

Soares J, Ralha S, Fonseca S, Prego J, Barbosa-Ducharne M. Why and How Do Parents Decide to Adopt? A Study on Motivations and the Decision-Making Process in Becoming an Adoptive Family. Child Fam Soc Work. 2022;28(3):753–763. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.13001

Palmer C, Coffey A, Rees A. The Motivations and Decision-Making Processes of Parents Who Adopt Older Children. Adopt Foster. 2023;47(2):211–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/03085759231174906

Bauer H, Sauer N, Becker C. Investigating the Relationship Between Product Involvement and Consumer Decision Making Styles. J Consum Behav. 2006;5:342–354. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.185

Lotfizadeh F, Lotfizadeh F. Comparing High-Involvement and Low-Involvement Products: Brand Perspective. Int J Manage Account Econ. 2015;2:404–413.

Williams D, Noyes J. How Does Our Perception of Risk Influence Decision-Making? Implications for the Design of Risk Information. Theor Issues Ergon Sci. 2007;8:1–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/14639220500484419

Walters C, Paul G. Consumer Behavior: An Integrated Framework. R. D. Irwin; 1970.

Philip K, Kellter K. Marketing Management. 14e. Prentice-Hall; 2012.

Kotler P, Wong V, Saunders J, Armstrong G. Principles of Marketing. Pearson Financial Times Prentice Hall; 2005.

Bruner G, Pomazal R. Problem Recognition: The Crucial First Stage of the Consumer Decision Process. J Serv Market. 1988;2:43–53. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb024733

Berger J. Word of Mouth and Interpersonal Communication: A Review and Directions for Future Research. J Consum Psychol. 2014;24:586–607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2014.05.002

Price L, Feick L. The Role of Interpersonal Sources in External Search: An Informational Perspective. ACR North American Advances; 1984.

Simpson J, Griskevicius V, Rothman A. Consumer Decisions in Relationships. J Consum Psychol. 2012;22:304–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2011.09.007

Castleberry S, McIntyre F. Consumers Quality Evaluation Process. J Appl Bus Res. 1992;8:74–82. https://doi.org/10.19030/jabr.v8i3.6147

Mishra O. Sources of Need Recognition in Online Consumers Decision Making Process. Int J Exclusive Manag Res. 2018;8:1–13.

Iftikhar M, Hussain M, Kahn Z, Iiyas S. Social Class is a Myth or Reality in Buying Behavior. Afr J Bus Manag. 2013;7:713.

Williams T. Social Class Influences on Purchase Evaluation Criteria. J Consum Market. 2002;19:249–276. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760210426067

Coleman R. The Continuing Significance of Social Class to Marketing. J Consum Res. 1983;10:265–280. https://doi.org/10.1086/208966

Guenther K. The Lives and Deaths of Shelter Animals. Stanford University Press; 2020.

Weaver H. Bad Dog: Pit Bull Politics and Multispecies Justice. University of Washington Press; 2021.

YesBiscuit! Unwilling: The Bias Against Poor People Who Want to Save Shelter Pets. Accessed Dec 22, 2013. https://yesbiscuit.com/2013/12/22/unwilling-the-bias-against-poor-people-who-want-to-save-shelter-pets/

Albuquerque Journal. End Racial Bias in Animal Adoption; People of All Colors Love Pets. Accessed Apr 30, 2021. https://www.abqjournal.com/news/end-racial-bias-in-animal-adoption-people-of-all-colors-love-pets/article_e6b116ba-d997-5ae3-ad3a-e96a6239fe77.html

Sniff.com. Recognizing and Dismantling Racism in Animal Rescue. Accessed Dec 12, 2020. https://www.thesniff.com/blm/

Rauktis M, Lee H, Bickel L, Giovengo H, Nagel M, Cahalane H. Food Security Challenges and Health Opportunities of Companion Animal Ownership for Low-Income Adults. J Evid Based Soc Work. 2020;17(6):662–676. https://doi.org/10.1080/26408066.2020.1781726

Hirschman E. Consumers and Their Animal Companions. J Consum Res. 1994;20(4):616–632.

Bellenger D, Bernhardt K, Goldstucker J. Qualitative Research in Marketing. Marketing Classics Press; 2011.

Siettou C, Fraser I, Fraser R. Investigating Some of the Factors That Influence ‘Consumer’ Choice When Adopting a Shelter Dog in the United Kingdom. J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2014;17(2):136–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888705.2014.883924

Packer R, Brand C, Belshaw Z, Pegram C, Stevens K, O’Neill D. Pandemic Puppies: Characterising Motivations and Behaviours of UK Owners Who Purchased Puppies During the 2020 COVID-19 Pandemic. Animals. 2021;11:2500. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11092500

Eriksson P, Kovalainen A. Qualitative Methods in Business Research. Sage; 2008.

Link B, Phelan J. Social Conditions as Fundamental Causes of Disease. J Health Soc Behav. 1995;35 (extra issue):580–594.

Schnittker J, McLeod J. The Social Psychology of Health Disparities. Annu Rev Sociol. 2005;31:75–103. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.110622

Braverman P, Cubbin C, Egerter S, Chideya S, Marchi, Metzler M. et al. Socioeconomic Status in Health Research: One Size Does Not Fit All. J Am Med Assoc. 2005;294:2879–2888. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.294.22.2879

Andersson M. How Do We Assign Ourselves Social Status? A Cross-Cultural Test of the Cognitive Averaging Principle. Soc Sci Res. 2015;52:317–329.

Goodman E, Huang B, Schafer-Kalkhoff T, Adler N. Perceived Socioeconomic Status: A New Type of Identity That Influences Adolescents‘ Self-Rated Health. J Adolesc Health. 2007;41:479–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.05.020

Manstead A. The Psychology of Social Class: How Socioeconomic Status Impacts Thought, Feelings and Behavior. Br J Soc Psychol. 2018;57:267–291.

Weller S, Vickers B, Bernard H, Blackburn A, Borgatti S, Gravlee C. et al. Open-ended Interview Questions and Saturation. PLoS One. 2918;13(6):e0198606. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198606

Seers K. Qualitative Data Analysis. Evid Based Nurs. 2012;15:2. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebnurs.2011.100352

Arluke A, Rolfe L. The Photographed Cat: Picturing Human-Feline Ties, 1890–1940. Syracuse University Press; 2013.

North Shore Animal League America. Adopt a Walking Buddy. Accessed Mar 15, 2023. https://www.animalleague.org/blog/tips/pet-adoption/adopt-walking-buddy/

Los Angles County Animal Care. Need a Workout Buddy: Adopt a Dog! Accessed Apr 11, 2019. https://animalcare.lacounty.gov/need-a-workout-buddy-adopt-a-dog/

Holland K, Mead R, Casey R, Upjohn M, Christley R. Why Do People Want Dogs? A Mixed-Methods Study of Motivations for Dog Acquisition in the United Kingdom. Front Vet Sci. 2022;10:1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.877950

Marston L, Bennett P, Coleman G. Adopting Shelter Dogs: Owner Experiences of the First Month Post-Adoption. Anthrozoös. 2005;18:358–378. https://doi.org/10.2752/089279305785593965

Hugstad P, Taylor J. and Bruce G. The Effects of Social Class and Perceived Risk on Consumer Information Search. J Consum Market. 1987;4:41–46. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb008195

Hobbs J, Goddard E. Consumers and Trust. Food Policy. 2015;52:71–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.10.017

Martin S. Pit bull Adopted After 4 Long Years At Animal Shelter. Here’s Why There Are So Many Like Him. USA Today. Accessed Jun 5, 2023. https://www.usatoday.com/story/life/animalkind/2023/06/05/pit-bulls-us-animal-shelters/70286323007/

Humane Society of the United States (HSUS). Community Support: The Future of Companion Animal Welfare. Accessed Mar 4, 2024. https://humanepro.org/sites/default/files/documents/pfl-data-report.pdf

Leibtag E, Kaufman P. Exploring Food Purchase Behavior of Low-Income Households: How Do They Economize? Current Issues in Economics of Food Markets. Agricultural Information Bulletin No. 747-07. US Department of Agriculture; 2003.

Williams C, Windebank J. The ‘Excluded Consumer’: A Neglected Aspect of Social Exclusion? Policy Politics. 2002;30:501–513. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557302760590422

Gannon C, Liu Z. Poverty and Transport (No. TWU-30). 1997. World Bank.

Rucker D, Galinsky A. Desire to Acquire: Powerlessness and Compensatory Consumption. J Consum Res. 2008;35(2): 257–267.

Greenleaf E, Lehmann D. Reasons for Substantial Delay in Consumer Decision Making. J Consum Res. 1995;22:186–199. https://doi.org/10.1086/209444

Morwitz V, Schmittlein D. Using Segmentation to Improve Sales Forecasts Based On Purchase Intent: Which ‘Intenders’ Actually Buy? J Market Res. 1992;29:391–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379202900401

Payne J, Bettman J, Johnson E. Consumer Decision Making. In: Kassarjian H, Robertson T, eds. Handbook of Consumer Behaviour. University of California Press; 1991:50–84.

Rook D. The Buying Impulse. J Consum Res. 1987;14:189–199. https://doi.org/10.1086/209105

Wood M. Socio-Economic Status, Delay of Gratification, and Impulse Buying. J Econ Psychol. 1998;19:295–320.

Coleman R. The Significance of Social Stratification in Selling. In: Bell M, ed. Marketing: A Maturing Discipline: Proceedings of the American Marketing Association. American Marketing Association; 1961:171–184.

Zola I. Pathways to the Doctor – From Person to Patient. Soc Sci Med. 1973 (1967);7:677–689. https://doi.org/10.1016/0037-7856(73)90002-4

Arluke A. Coping With Pet Food Insecurity in Low-Income Communities. Anthrozoos. 2021;34(3):339–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2021.1898215

Lee S, Cotte J. Post-Purchase Consumer Regret: Conceptualization and development of the PPCR Scale. Adv Consum Res. 2009;36:456–462.

Gutek B. On the Accuracy of Retrospective Attitudinal Data. Public Opin Q. 1978;42:390–401.

Weiss W, Gramann S, Dolan E, Scotto J, Slater M. Do Policy Based Adoptions Increase the Care a Pet Receives? An Exploration of a Shift to Conversation Based Adoptions at One Shelter. Open J Anim Sci. 2014;4:312–322. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojas.2014.45040

Balcom S, Arluke A. Animal Adoption as Negotiated Order: A Comparison of Open Versus Traditional Shelter Approaches. Anthrozoös. 2001;41:135–150. https://doi.org/10.2752/089279301786999445

Rauktis M, Hoy-Gerlach J, Sewall C, Lee H, Bickel L. Preliminary Findings of a Ten-Item Scale to Assess the Commitment of Low-Income Owners to Their Companion Animals. Anthrozoös. 2021;34:109–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2021.1878682

Garrison L, Weiss E. What Do People Want? Factors People Consider When Acquiring Dogs, The Complexity of The Choices They Make, and Implications for Nonhuman Animal Relocation Programs. J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2015;18:57–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888705.2014.943836

Lebeau D. Adopting a Purebred Dog From a Shelter. Best Friends Stories. Accessed Mar 4, 2024. https://bestfriends.org/stories/features/adopting-purebred-dog-shelter

Mohan-Gibbons H, Weiss E, Garrison L, Allison M. Evaluation of a Novel Dog Adoption Program in Two US Communities. PLoS One. 2014;9:e91959. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0091959

Functional Dog Collaborative. Position Statement on Shelters and Dog Breeding. Accessed Mar 7, 2022. https://functionalbreeding.org/2022/03/07/position-statement-on-shelters-and-dog-breeding/

LaVallee E, Mueller M, McCobb E. A Systematic Review of the Literature Addressing Veterinary Care for Underserved Communities. J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2017;20:381–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888705.2017.1337515

Stull J, Shelby J, Bonnett B, Block G, Budsberg S, Dean R, et al. Barriers and Next Steps to Providing a Spectrum of Effective Health Care to Companion Animals. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2018;253:1386–1389. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.253.11.1386

Additional Files

Published

2024-11-13

How to Cite

Arluke, A., & Rauktis, M. E. (2024). Dog Acquisition in Lower-Income Communities as Consumer Behavior: An Exploratory Qualitative Study. Journal of Shelter Medicine and Community Animal Health, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.56771/jsmcah.v3.73

Issue

Section

Original Research Article

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.